Blackcyclops wrote: ↑27 Jan 2023, 03:57
I ask this genuinely: what does it actually mean in relationship to a story like this to say “event burn out”?
I mean is it the fact that events in this story directly affect events in two other books (X-Men Red and Way of X)? Like if Gillen told the exact same story in Immortal X-Men and just published it weekly to have the same amount of issues, would your feelings on this freshly starting story change?
Actually, yes. Immortal X-Men, Legion of X and X-Men Red aren’t even a year old, and in that time they’ve been pulled in to two crossover events. I love Gillen as a writer; ditto Spurrier and Ewing. They’re doing amazing work. While I feel Red has hit an authentic spot where it can pause and tell this story before continuing, I’m not certain that I’d say the same for Legion. It feels like a rather disjointed break. The disjointed story-telling has been one of my biggest critiques of X-Force as I’m sure you recall, and while I take the very subtle nudge that I’m maybe over-reacting to the first issue of a (as I said, well-written and drawn) event, I don’t think it’s necessarily unfair for me to say I’m having event burn out. Lest we forget, it’s January 2023– and we’ve already had Dark Web and now this event that have fallen in this calendar year— and AXE wasn’t too long ago either. That’s three events within… what? Three months of one another? All of which have created important beats within the ongoing Krakoan era. My dude, by anyone’s standards, that’s a LOT.
It can’t be the scale of the story right? I mean there are plenty of examples of “big” stories that aren’t billed as events. Matter of fact every story in some way alters the status quo of the larger narrative. And when they do the first critique is “nothing happened”.
I actually think you’ve hit the nail on the head here. I honestly feel like the entire Krakoan era has felt like one long event. Some of it has been absolutely amazing, but it really does feel, to me, like we’re in the downward spiral of a several years long event. While I’m still reading the majority of the books, I just don’t feel like the quality is necessarily consistent any more to me. Add to this that it’s three of the books that I think have remained consistently good or higher in the last year, and I’m definitely back to the “was this necessarily the point in the narrative to take a three month hiatus from the main story?” point.
Is it the fanfare and promotion around the story? That I can get behind but as someone who’s started working in mRketing, I get it.
Absolutely. Absolutely.
I’m just asking because it’s a statement that confounds me because I’m just never sure what in particular it’s talking about.
For this story, so far, the only real difference between it and another big story like say Spurrier’s Way of X epic (which is about almost as large in scale but just doesn’t crossover to let other writers contribute) is that it has direct input from other writers. Otherwise, it’s not really any different in terms of scale or paying off older plot threads. Hell, the one benefit of this story is that Gillen does allow two other top-tier writers to contribute.
I feel like I’ve already addressed these points.
Idk, maybe I’m biased because as Cable pointed out: Sinister has to be the hero of the story and that is just hilarious to me. But I understand if 1)you hate HoX/PoX Era, 2) Dislike the Moira X aspect, 3) don’t like Gillen’s writing, or 4) just dislike a story like this and the focus on Sinister and that’s why you don’t like this story, though.
1 I don’t hate this era but I do think that the quality across the franchise has taken a dip since Inferno and Ayala’s departure.
2. I think that’s actually quite clever and as a gamer, love the concept of a “save point” in “reality”.
3. I love Gillen’s work as covered previously
4. I like this version of Sinister. I like that his sneakiness is coming to bite him in the arse. I like that despite him thinking he’s the cleverest person in any room, he’s still a victim of his hubris here. Like I said, I like the writing and the art. On paper I feel like this event should be one that I absolutely love.
And yet…
I was intentionally and specifically vague in my response to this. It’s well written and drawn and seeds some interesting ideas. I just really don’t know why I’m so “meh” about it and the only thing I can think that would explain it is that I went in to this issue gearing myself up mentally for “another” event. I get that it’s a me thing, and I get that the “another” is absolutely my own emphasis, but like… dude come on it’s been a LOT