Welcome to unstablemolecules.com, the discussion home for mightyavengers.net, uncanon.com and uncannyxmen.net!
Legion of X #4
- Blackcyclops
- Posts: 25439
- Joined: 12 Apr 2007, 21:03
Legion of X #4
I friggin knew it! Great last page(s) reveal…I very much look forward to the conclusion of this arc.
So on one hand we have the existence of a being who can reset the entire timeline, destroying everything…, and on the other hand we have a few mind wipes and some gaslighting. You're right, totally evenly weighted.
-Cly
-Cly
Re: Legion of X #4
Issue of the week for me, but my BAMF bias is showing heavily here.
This was excellent, I thoroughly enjoy this every month (although it bothers me that due to timing, this is set waaaaaaay before AXE). The art is wonderful, the plot is a delight, and the writing just pops. Ugh. Love this.
This was excellent, I thoroughly enjoy this every month (although it bothers me that due to timing, this is set waaaaaaay before AXE). The art is wonderful, the plot is a delight, and the writing just pops. Ugh. Love this.
Sinister’s Lab now secretly altering other player’s posts in the RPG section
- Blackcyclops
- Posts: 25439
- Joined: 12 Apr 2007, 21:03
Re: Legion of X #4
Its wild that in 1 week we didn’t get a single weak x-title.
So on one hand we have the existence of a being who can reset the entire timeline, destroying everything…, and on the other hand we have a few mind wipes and some gaslighting. You're right, totally evenly weighted.
-Cly
-Cly
Re: Legion of X #4
The power of a week without X-Force, Wolverine or MaraudersBlackcyclops wrote: ↑04 Aug 2022, 16:53Its wild that in 1 week we didn’t get a single weak x-title.
Sinister’s Lab now secretly altering other player’s posts in the RPG section
- Blackcyclops
- Posts: 25439
- Joined: 12 Apr 2007, 21:03
Re: Legion of X #4
das_boot wrote: ↑04 Aug 2022, 17:17The power of a week without X-Force, Wolverine or MaraudersBlackcyclops wrote: ↑04 Aug 2022, 16:53Its wild that in 1 week we didn’t get a single weak x-title.![]()
I won’t let you shat on Marauders…art aside, I like it
So on one hand we have the existence of a being who can reset the entire timeline, destroying everything…, and on the other hand we have a few mind wipes and some gaslighting. You're right, totally evenly weighted.
-Cly
-Cly
Re: Legion of X #4
Interesting, so the Arakki god on the run was Loki... in a way... lol
I like Zsen calling out Nightcrawler on how flexible/vague his interpretation of the law is, and Nightcrawler suggesting it's a feature, not a bug.

I like Zsen calling out Nightcrawler on how flexible/vague his interpretation of the law is, and Nightcrawler suggesting it's a feature, not a bug.
Kinda annoys me they put all the good titles in one week and then another week we get nothing except GambitBlackcyclops wrote: ↑04 Aug 2022, 16:53Its wild that in 1 week we didn’t get a single weak x-title.

Re: Legion of X #4
Kurt already addressed it in Way of X:
"A bad law is just a rule. A good law allows for the flexibility of the human heart."
"A bad law is just a rule. A good law allows for the flexibility of the human heart."
"If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you." -- Oscar Wilde
Re: Legion of X #4
So in one week we got a book about the power of faith and another about the weaknesses of faith. Coincidence or Jordan White being clever? 
I feel like this is the issue we have been waiting for since Way of X started, where Kurt really dives down into his beliefs in the face of the new era. Where he ends up is still to be determined but I enjoy the journey.
Mental exercise: If it came down to throwing Nightcrawler in the pit or not (is it even still a thing after Sabretooth?), how would each member of the Council vote?
I feel like this is the issue we have been waiting for since Way of X started, where Kurt really dives down into his beliefs in the face of the new era. Where he ends up is still to be determined but I enjoy the journey.
Mental exercise: If it came down to throwing Nightcrawler in the pit or not (is it even still a thing after Sabretooth?), how would each member of the Council vote?
Best Comics of Week 37
X-titles: Astonishing Iceman #2 by Steve Orlando (2) and Vincenzo Carratu (2)
Non-X titles: Avengers Inc #1 by Al Ewing (2) and Leonard Kirk (2)
In parentheses number of times creator had best comic this year
X-titles: Astonishing Iceman #2 by Steve Orlando (2) and Vincenzo Carratu (2)
Non-X titles: Avengers Inc #1 by Al Ewing (2) and Leonard Kirk (2)
In parentheses number of times creator had best comic this year
Re: Legion of X #4
CASE: Nightcrawler (Kurt Wagner)
CHARGE: Violation of the Third Law. Interpretation of "Respect this sacred land" to mean "Respect the authority of the Quiet Council", i.e., letting them judge people instead of letting the Legion do it.
EVIDENCE: Argument whether Nightcrawler, as a member of the Council, has / should have the right to judge cases without the full council's presence.
VERDICT:
Professor X - GUILTY. Because douche.
Destiny - Probably NOT GUILTY. Specifically to rib Xavier, but she always knows more than we do.
Hope - NOT GUILTY.
Storm - NOT GUILTY.
Colossus - NOT GUILTY. Sleeper agent in Colossus's head - Possibly GUILTY.
Nightcrawler - NOT GUILTY if allowed a vote.
Kate Pryde - NOT GUILTY.
Emma Frost - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on her mood, and the votes of others.
Sebastian Shaw - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on his mood, and the votes of others.
Mister Sinister - Probably GUILTY.
Exodus - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on his interpretation of the Spark and Kurt's "good works".
Mystique - Probably NOT GUILTY. Because he supported Destiny, because she doesn't care, etc.
2 - 6 GUILTYS.
5 - 9 NOT GUILTYS.
CHARGE: Violation of the Third Law. Interpretation of "Respect this sacred land" to mean "Respect the authority of the Quiet Council", i.e., letting them judge people instead of letting the Legion do it.
EVIDENCE: Argument whether Nightcrawler, as a member of the Council, has / should have the right to judge cases without the full council's presence.
VERDICT:
Professor X - GUILTY. Because douche.
Destiny - Probably NOT GUILTY. Specifically to rib Xavier, but she always knows more than we do.
Hope - NOT GUILTY.
Storm - NOT GUILTY.
Colossus - NOT GUILTY. Sleeper agent in Colossus's head - Possibly GUILTY.
Nightcrawler - NOT GUILTY if allowed a vote.
Kate Pryde - NOT GUILTY.
Emma Frost - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on her mood, and the votes of others.
Sebastian Shaw - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on his mood, and the votes of others.
Mister Sinister - Probably GUILTY.
Exodus - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on his interpretation of the Spark and Kurt's "good works".
Mystique - Probably NOT GUILTY. Because he supported Destiny, because she doesn't care, etc.
2 - 6 GUILTYS.
5 - 9 NOT GUILTYS.
"If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you." -- Oscar Wilde
- Holland Oates
- Posts: 984
- Joined: 28 Jan 2021, 16:15
Re: Legion of X #4
Cable wrote: ↑05 Aug 2022, 17:10So in one week we got a book about the power of faith and another about the weaknesses of faith. Coincidence or Jordan White being clever?
I feel like this is the issue we have been waiting for since Way of X started, where Kurt really dives down into his beliefs in the face of the new era. Where he ends up is still to be determined but I enjoy the journey.
Mental exercise: If it came down to throwing Nightcrawler in the pit or not (is it even still a thing after Sabretooth?), how would each member of the Council vote?
…but he teleports
Re: Legion of X #4
They will find a reason to throw Leech into the Pit too. Problem solved.Holland Oates wrote: ↑05 Aug 2022, 17:38Cable wrote: ↑05 Aug 2022, 17:10So in one week we got a book about the power of faith and another about the weaknesses of faith. Coincidence or Jordan White being clever?
I feel like this is the issue we have been waiting for since Way of X started, where Kurt really dives down into his beliefs in the face of the new era. Where he ends up is still to be determined but I enjoy the journey.
Mental exercise: If it came down to throwing Nightcrawler in the pit or not (is it even still a thing after Sabretooth?), how would each member of the Council vote?
…but he teleports
Best Comics of Week 37
X-titles: Astonishing Iceman #2 by Steve Orlando (2) and Vincenzo Carratu (2)
Non-X titles: Avengers Inc #1 by Al Ewing (2) and Leonard Kirk (2)
In parentheses number of times creator had best comic this year
X-titles: Astonishing Iceman #2 by Steve Orlando (2) and Vincenzo Carratu (2)
Non-X titles: Avengers Inc #1 by Al Ewing (2) and Leonard Kirk (2)
In parentheses number of times creator had best comic this year
- Blackcyclops
- Posts: 25439
- Joined: 12 Apr 2007, 21:03
Re: Legion of X #4
Even better, instruct Krakoa to sap enough energy from him so that his powers don’t work…
I have to say, the composite Trickster god look pretty bad-ass.
I have to say, the composite Trickster god look pretty bad-ass.
So on one hand we have the existence of a being who can reset the entire timeline, destroying everything…, and on the other hand we have a few mind wipes and some gaslighting. You're right, totally evenly weighted.
-Cly
-Cly
Re: Legion of X #4
While I love everything about this, I honestly think Emma is a solid Not Guilty— in the rare instances where she and Kurt have interacted, she seems to be rather fond of him in a way that she isn’t of a lot of other X-MenMonolith wrote: ↑05 Aug 2022, 17:27CASE: Nightcrawler (Kurt Wagner)
CHARGE: Violation of the Third Law. Interpretation of "Respect this sacred land" to mean "Respect the authority of the Quiet Council", i.e., letting them judge people instead of letting the Legion do it.
EVIDENCE: Argument whether Nightcrawler, as a member of the Council, has / should have the right to judge cases without the full council's presence.
VERDICT:
Professor X - GUILTY. Because douche.
Destiny - Probably NOT GUILTY. Specifically to rib Xavier, but she always knows more than we do.
Hope - NOT GUILTY.
Storm - NOT GUILTY.
Colossus - NOT GUILTY. Sleeper agent in Colossus's head - Possibly GUILTY.
Nightcrawler - NOT GUILTY if allowed a vote.
Kate Pryde - NOT GUILTY.
Emma Frost - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on her mood, and the votes of others.
Sebastian Shaw - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on his mood, and the votes of others.
Mister Sinister - Probably GUILTY.
Exodus - QUESTIONABLE. Depends on his interpretation of the Spark and Kurt's "good works".
Mystique - Probably NOT GUILTY. Because he supported Destiny, because she doesn't care, etc.
2 - 6 GUILTYS.
5 - 9 NOT GUILTYS.
Sinister’s Lab now secretly altering other player’s posts in the RPG section
- tokenBG1009
- Posts: 7520
- Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 20:34
Re: Legion of X #4
In the weirdest argument for Emma's adoration of Kurt, she was one of the names mentioned in her kinda sweet/kinda weird discussion about her grey hairs. So she's pretty firmly in the Not Guilty in my opinion. I think Mystique and Destiny would both be in Not Guilty as well due to family relationship. Rogue would basically skewer them both if they put Kurt in the pit.
"Sometimes I do feel like I'm a failure. Like there's no hope for me. But even so, I'm not gonna give up. Ever!" -Izuku Midoriya